When it comes to analyzing polymers and biopolymers, the term GPC vs SEC often comes up. These two techniques might sound similar, but they actually serve different purposes. At ResolveMass Laboratories Inc., we believe that using the right terminology improves the quality of scientific work. Knowing the difference between GPC and SEC is key to getting accurate molecular weight data and meaningful results in both research and industry.
In this article, we’ll explain what these terms mean, how they work, where they’re used, and why choosing the right one matters for your analysis.
What Is Size-Based Chromatography?
Size-based chromatography is a technique used to separate molecules based on their size in a solution. Unlike other types of chromatography that depend on charge or chemical interactions, this method works on the principle of size exclusion. Larger molecules pass through the column more quickly, while smaller ones take longer because they move through tiny pores in the material.
This technique is very helpful in polymer science and biotechnology. It allows for accurate and repeatable separation, which is important when you need reliable data about molecular structure or size.
Understanding GPC vs SEC: What They Mean and Where They’re Used
GPC (Gel Permeation Chromatography) is used mainly with organic solvents. It’s perfect for studying synthetic, water-insoluble polymers such as polystyrene, PLA, PLGA, and PCL. In GPC, gel-filled columns separate molecules based on their size in relation to the pore size of the gel.
SEC (Size Exclusion Chromatography), on the other hand, is used in water-based systems. It’s more suitable for proteins, peptides, and other water-soluble biopolymers. Although both GPC and SEC use size to separate molecules, their applications differ because of the solvents and sample types involved.
At ResolveMass Laboratories, we help clients choose the best method to ensure accurate and reproducible results.
👉 Learn more on What is Gel Permeation Chromatography
Key Differences Between GPC and SEC
Here’s a simple comparison of GPC vs SEC to help you understand how they differ:
- Solvent Type: GPC uses organic solvents (like THF or chloroform), while SEC uses aqueous buffers (like PBS).
- Sample Type: GPC is ideal for synthetic polymers. SEC is better for proteins and biopolymers.
- Column Material: GPC uses hydrophobic gels; SEC uses hydrophilic, water-compatible gels.
- Industries Used: GPC is often used in pharmaceuticals and polymer production. SEC is common in life sciences and biotech.
- Mobile Phase: GPC operates with non-polar solvents; SEC uses polar solvents.
These differences can greatly affect your results. That’s why it’s important to select the right method based on your material and testing goals.
📌 For in-depth GPC expertise: GPC Analysis Services
How GPC vs SEC Impacts Polymer Analysis
The method you choose will affect how your data turns out. GPC is very useful for calculating molecular properties such as:
- Number Average Molecular Weight (Mn)
- Weight Average Molecular Weight (Mw)
- Polydispersity Index (PDI)
- Intrinsic viscosity and chain conformation
At ResolveMass Laboratories, we use advanced GPC setups with multiple detectors like RI, MALS, and viscometers. These help provide detailed molecular profiles for research and industrial applications.
👉 Read: GPC for Polymer Characterization
Why Work With ResolveMass Laboratories?
ResolveMass Laboratories Inc. is a trusted name in both GPC and SEC analysis. Our team includes experienced scientists and experts in polymer analytics. Here’s what sets us apart:
- Over 20 years of hands-on experience in chromatography
- Advanced equipment with multi-detector systems
- Strong focus on quality control and calibration
- Peer-reviewed publications and global credibility
We don’t just deliver data—we provide insights that help drive innovation and product development.
Explore our GPC Calibration Standards to see how we ensure traceability and compliance with global benchmarks.
GPC for Biodegradable Polymers
Materials like PLA, PLGA, and PCL are widely used in biodegradable applications. GPC offers unique advantages in analyzing these polymers. Compared to SEC, GPC provides better separation of low molecular weight components when using organic solvents. This leads to sharper, more accurate results.
This is especially important in medical, pharmaceutical, and environmental applications where material performance is critical.
📍 Dive deeper: GPC Analysis of PLA, PLGA, PCL
Choosing Between GPC vs SEC for Your Project
Choosing between GPC vs SEC isn’t just about picking a solvent. It involves understanding your material, your industry needs, and the level of detail required. Some factors to consider include:
- Regulatory requirements and international standards
- Solubility and chemical stability of your sample
- Sensitivity and resolution needed for the analysis
- Detector compatibility for more advanced measurements
Our consultative approach at ResolveMass means we work closely with clients to choose the best method for every project.
📖 Learn more: GPC Analysis of Polymers
Conclusion: Context Is Everything in GPC vs SEC
Understanding the differences between GPC and SEC helps you make smarter decisions in your testing process. While both methods separate molecules by size, their use cases, solvents, and equipment are different. That’s why choosing the correct technique can lead to more accurate, reliable data.
If you’re working with synthetic polymers, biodegradable materials, or biopolymers, the right method matters. ResolveMass Laboratories is here to guide you with expert advice and advanced technology.
Trust ResolveMass Laboratories Inc.—your partner in advanced size-based chromatography.
📞 Contact us for expert consultation
📨 Book your GPC project today
🤝 Start your SEC or GPC evaluation now
FAQs
GPC and SEC work on the same principle of separating molecules by size, but they are not exactly the same. GPC usually uses organic solvents and is used for synthetic polymers, while SEC often uses water-based solutions and is better for proteins or biopolymers. People sometimes mix the terms, but they are used for different types of samples.
Yes, GPC is a type of SEC. Both methods separate molecules based on their size using a porous column. GPC is just the name used when the technique is done with organic solvents, mainly for analyzing plastic-like polymers. So, GPC falls under the broader SEC category.
GPC is called size exclusion chromatography because it separates molecules based on how big or small they are. Larger molecules can’t enter the small pores in the column, so they pass through quickly. Smaller ones enter the pores and take longer. This size-based separation is what gives it the name.
GFC (Gel Filtration Chromatography) and GPC (Gel Permeation Chromatography) are both types of size exclusion chromatography, but they differ in the solvents they use. GFC is usually done in water and is great for proteins, while GPC uses organic solvents and is better for synthetic polymers. The main difference is the sample type and solvent used.
You should choose GPC when working with synthetic, water-insoluble polymers like PLA, PLGA, or polystyrene. GPC uses organic solvents that are better suited for these materials. It also offers accurate molecular weight data, making it ideal for plastic and biodegradable polymer research.
Yes, SEC is better for protein analysis because it uses water-based solvents that protect protein structure. It gently separates proteins by size without damaging them. This makes SEC a reliable method for studying proteins in biotechnology and pharmaceutical research.
GPC and SEC can’t be run in the same system because they use different solvents. However, you can use both methods separately to study different parts of a complex sample. This gives a more complete view, especially when your material has both synthetic and biological components.
Calibration is important in GPC because it ensures that the molecular weight results are accurate and trustworthy. It involves using known polymer standards to set a reference. Without proper calibration, the data may be off and lead to wrong conclusions about your sample.
